Re: Nothing Will Change Until Musharraf Closes Pakistan's Militant Madrassas
Jul 22, 2005 12:25 PM
The problem is not Madarassas, the problem is the mullah's associated with Army.
The religious schools have been there for a long time and they were never involved in any sectarian or so called terrorist activities. It all started by Uncle Sam when Russians invaded Afghanistan. CIA and US government were looking people to fight Russians in their proxy war.
As usual, the long trusted puppets of Napak Army came to the rescue and presented CIA with the concept of Jihad. CIA liked the idea and showered ISI with billions of dollars (evident by the rich families of Zia, Akhtar Abdul Rehman and others), arms and helped to train poor students from religious schools. This could not have been done without baiting Mullah's like Fazlu and Co.
These satins sold the often poor, orphan students from their religious schools to be used as fuel for the proxy war (they themselves never went to actual battle fields).
Now at that time these religious students were assured that once Russians are defeated, they can have an Islamic government in Afghanistan.
Again as usual, Uncle SAM betrayed his allies and told them that an Islamic government is unacceptable. That was the turning point for these religious students. Now even Fazlu and Co. cannot control them as these students have seen the true faces of these mullahs.
As far as the terrorist attacks on religious places in Pakistan, this is all done by ISI. Interestingly no one ever has been caught in these incidents, although they have the power to pick any citizen and sell it to foreign country. Musharraf is using ISI to do these terrorist attacks so that he can "cry wolf" to the west and remain as the King.
Fazlu and Co. are still the B team of ISI and waste no chance to get benefits from Musharraf.
Despite taking 80% of total budget these so called jawans of Napak Army are unable to defend the sovereignty of their state.
Despite of a Pakistani origin, I must salute Indian army for the following reasons:
1-Since 1947, Indian army has successfully defended its territory and increased the land size. On the other hand napak army has not only failed in all aspects but caused the reduction of total land area of Pakistan. Anybody doubtful, just check the total land area of India in 1947 and today and then do the same for Pak.
2- Indian army never handed over any of its citizen (muslim or hindu) to any foreign country
3- Indian army never gifted its bases or allowed any foreign country to build any base in India
4- Indian army and government never allowed any foreign investigation team to roam free in India
5- Indian army never guided any foreign forces and pointed targets to any of its citizens (muslim or hindu)
6- Indian Generals never took the army as their father's property while Musharraf openly calims that the napak army is loyal to him (not to Pakistan)
6- Most importantly, Indian army never toppled any democratically elected government and neither killed a prime ministers. Napak army working as puppet since 1947 has killed 2 elected prime ministers.
I know there will be "scholars" arguing with me and the most common line will be, "Pakistan is a different country". Different in what aspect? We have the same climate, same type of land, got the same army, judiciary and civil structure from British. How come Indians gone that far? The only answer is the difference in Armies.